We each took the online assessment individually, which took less than 15 minutes. GiANT processed our results and sent us separate profiles. We’ve completed several other assessments over the years, so the results were not shockingly new, but they provided a quite accurate snapshot of the way we each interpret the world and offered nuanced insights. Over the next week or so, we each received several email follow-ups (but not so many as to be annoying) with prompts to apply what we learned and take small growth steps. From GiANT: “Over the past few emails, we’ve explored your unique personality blend and how it shapes not just your work, but your relationships, personal growth, and overall life approach. I hope these insights have provided valuable perspective on both your natural strengths and potential growth edges.”
We also were invited to continue to connect with subsequent offerings — more about those later.
James then took our individual assessments and created a four-page, personalized relationship dynamics report that helps us see “how our voices interact, what may cause tension, and how to grow together with greater awareness and intentionality.” Results include each of our voice orders, a list of how we individually process and express ourselves, and how we likely experience the other.
Steve and I both lead with a Guardian voice, which means “our relationship is grounded in responsibility, commitment, and a strong desire to protect what matters most. You share a deep respect for structure, clarity, and long-term stability.” “This starts out well,” I thought, although I would imagine other couples’ assessments might also open by highlighting a strength. Our different secondary voices “shape how you approach pace, risk, and emotional expression.”
Steve thinks carefully, prioritizing responsibility. I show care by solving problems and am action oriented. It’s not a stretch to see how those traits, while strengths individually, can occasionally conflict in a decades-long marriage.
The report also lists reactions each of us might experience under moderate or extreme stress, unhealthy defense mechanisms and common trigger situations. Some patterns showed up there that made our 28-year-old son, who was reading over our shoulder, laugh out loud. Guess we resembled those remarks …
Tools to grow closer offered practical strategies to “liberate” one another. Specific solutions included a reminder to “invite the other’s input before moving forward,” and the phrases, “I trust you – I just want us aligned,” and “What concerns should we address before deciding?”
The report concluded with ideas for growth including, “Celebrate both stability and progress as shared wins” and “practice curiosity before reaction, IE: ‘Help me understand your thinking.’” Concluding words of encouragement reminded us that “our shared ‘we’ makes us a better than either’s ‘me.’”